Sunday, September 12, 2010
Previous Posts
- A date which will live in ...
- Hat trick of survey fail
- But this is real!
- Vintage NYT
- Sentence of the morning
- 'Cognitive dissonance' for $100, Alex
- The preadolescents are alright all right
- Book, chapter, vs.
- Avast, me hardies
- Stop press: Editor denounces text!
Mailbag!
- vulteef [at] gmail [dot] com
- Testy Copy Editors
- ACES
- Bad Science
- Regret the Error
- Romenesko
- Common Sense Journalism
- You Don't Say
- EditTeach
- Ask the stylebook
- Media Watch
- Blogslot
- Editor's Desk
- Words at Work
- Ten Minutes Past Deadline
- Madam Grammar
- Media Myths Alert
- Old Word Wolf
- WSJ: Style and substance
- Today's Front Pages
- Language Hat
- Language Log
- The Greenbelt
- Language Politics
- Oxford University Press
- Mr. Verb and the other Verbs
- Wishydig
- Throw Grammar from the Train
- Sentence First
- Online syntax textbook (Santorini & Kroch)
- Economist country briefings
- State Dept. country data
- Inflation calculator
- VassarStats
1 Comments:
Since you haven't seen fit to cite your source here, it's a little difficult to figure out the context....
Post a Comment
<< Home