Go fish
Here's a charmingly ornate bit of fabrication from the Fox homepage Friday morning,* just to help set the stage for Saturday's "No Kings" festivities. Nothing in the display is actually a lie. "Dethroned" is the sort of verb that, like inflation spiking or a polling lead crumbling, can mean whatever the situation calls for; "as" doesn't imply the same sort of temporal connections at Fox that it does in real life; and "pushes peace post-pandemonium" is word gazpacho that sounds cool when you read it in Anchor Voice. But the overall result is a towering edifice of bullshit.
The headline with the story itself is a bit kinder, but the time link is still there. And the lede ... let's just say it adds complexity:
The progressive group Public Citizen insists its ‘No Kings’ protests aim to defend democracy — not disrupt it. But Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy’s claim that radicals may be "infiltrating" protests adds complexity to that narrative.Speaking to Fox Baltimore, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said federal agencies are concerned that extremist actors may be quietly embedding themselves within the ‘No Kings’ movement and questioned "who is funding this." Duffy did not cite specific intelligence, but his remarks echoed broader administration warnings about potential unrest tied to the protests this Saturday.
"I am all about free speech. I’m all about protest. It’s the great American way," Duffy told the outlet. "I am concerned about who is funding this. Who is paying for it? Who is organizing it?"
Nothing to surprise you there if you've been keeping up with the "broader administration warnings" and the usual Fox din about (ahem) rootless cosmopolitans. But this time, the evildoers actually get a chance to speak:
In an interview with Fox News Digital, Lisa Gilbert, co-president of Public Citizen, rejected suggestions that the movement had turned violent, saying that the goal was to send a message of unity rather than confrontation.
"The idea that America is a democracy is, at its core, small-'d' democratic. It’s not [the] Democrat [party]; it’s not [the] Republican [party]," she said. "It is the idea that we have a system that is based on checks and balances, where we understand that our elected officials answer to us. And that our votes count and matter."
"At its core that is what this ["No Kings"] is all about. And why people are turning out."
Fine, fine -- what about the dethroning violence and the coast-to-coast arrests?
While most "No Kings" demonstrations on June 14 were peaceful, a handful erupted into violence, leading to several arrests and at least one death. This Saturday, organizers say about 2,500 rallies are planned nationwide.
See if you can see a pattern in the June 14 eruptions that follow:
- Bystander in Salt Lake City killed in screwup by "event peacekeeper."
- Nine arrested at a march in Austin. Charges include interfering with public duties, disobeying a police officer, obstructing a passageway, providing false identification, walking on a roadway when sidewalks were provided, and felony assault of a peace officer.
- "Two people were arrested in connection with a hit-and-run crash at a "No Kings" protest in Southern California on June 14. ... The SUV driver veered toward marchers in Riverside, east of Los Angeles, and struck the woman, according to investigators."
- Three arrests in Ocala, Fla.: "arrested for battery after allegedly pushing a protester ... arrested for battery and possession of a weapon by a convicted felon after police said he pushed a protester while wearing brass knuckles ... arrested for battery after allegedly hitting someone with a cardboard sign."
- Culpeper, Va.: Goober "intentionally accelerated his vehicle into the dispersing crowd," striking at least one person." But back to our Fox narrative:
... Yet even as those events challenge the "peaceful" framing,** a different variable looms: the possibility of paid agitators or external provocateurs. Adam Swart, CEO of Crowds on Demand, warned that "No Kings" is susceptible to such infiltration.
"My concern is that there are forces — some domestic, some maybe foreign — that actually want to pull America apart," he said.
Conveniently, that's exactly what he said in the lead story last Sunday morning. You'll be shocked to learn that Brother Swart has also been a source for stories August 12 and 15, July 16, and June 21.
If past is prologue, then, expect some breathless Fox tales of mayhem over the next few days. Just be careful not to read the stories or you might find out which side is doing the vast bulk of the erupting.
* No. 8 story, around 10:35 a.m. Eastern US
** Framing scholar here. No, they don't








