No, he didn't. Had Mr. Trump actually said "God damn the Bush-Rubio relationship," that might have been interesting. Instead:
KEENE, New Hampshire -- GOP frontrunner Donald Trump
came out on the attack in New Hampshire on Wednesday, with strong
language to describe Florida senator Marco Rubio's warm relationship
with his former mentor, Gov. Jeb Bush.
How strong?
"They hate each other," Trump said of his rivals for the Republican
nomination. "They hate, trust me I know. They hate so much. They hate
more than anybody in this room hates their neighbor. But it's political
bullsh*t, do you understand? It's true."
CBS might faint at the very thought of the elongated yellow barnyard epithet being used in polite company (assuming it can figure out where all the pronouns attach and what Mr. Trump is actually trying to say, which are preconditions to figuring out whether this round of gibberish is remotely a lede). But on behalf of copy editors everywhere, I reserve the right to be annoyingly prescriptive on this topic: Without the presence of a certified bull god, "bullshit" is not profanity.
Dainty asterisks aside, is he describing the "warm relationship" itself as bullshit, or saying that his rivals' alleged public facade of enmity is bullshit? Or does the day's top political news from the elongated yellow primary state actually boil down to Grownup Says Bad Word? (Given that we're reduced to taking a wire story on Grownup Mistakenly Says True Word, there's cause to be concerned about the distribution of staff resources here.)
Covering the bull race is one thing. Ignoring everything but the bullshit is another. Beware the wrath of Apis.Labels: bullshit, language, peeves, prescriptivism