It's called 'chance'
posted by fev at 6:30 PM
Thursday, February 02, 2012
Previous Posts
- No, but thanks for asking
- Super-de-dooper-de ... oh, forget it
- Colege is good
- Not really. At least, not if they have a clue
- Wait til you see those bats
- Williams. Vaughan Williams.
- First, do no harm
- I'll have the chicken tartare
- If that's the kind of party it's going to be ...
- You know the drill
Mailbag!
- vulteef [at] gmail [dot] com
- Testy Copy Editors
- ACES
- Bad Science
- Regret the Error
- Romenesko
- Common Sense Journalism
- You Don't Say
- EditTeach
- Ask the stylebook
- Media Watch
- Blogslot
- Editor's Desk
- Words at Work
- Ten Minutes Past Deadline
- Madam Grammar
- Media Myths Alert
- Old Word Wolf
- WSJ: Style and substance
- Today's Front Pages
- Language Hat
- Language Log
- The Greenbelt
- Language Politics
- Oxford University Press
- Mr. Verb and the other Verbs
- Wishydig
- Throw Grammar from the Train
- Sentence First
- Online syntax textbook (Santorini & Kroch)
- Economist country briefings
- State Dept. country data
- Inflation calculator
- VassarStats
2 Comments:
That groundhog is now having a cold one with an Aqua Velva man.
Getting at least 9 out of 13 right would happen for 14% of groundhogs if the prediction was 50-50 (more if it wasn't 50-50), so there's even less excuse here than for Paul the soccer-predicting octopus.
Post a Comment
<< Home