Ministry of Fear
If you woke up feeling pretty good this morning -- get over it. Be scared! No, scareder!
Now. Should you read the story itself (and if you want to conclude from this that "reading the story" isn't a requirement at certain news outlets, go right ahead), you'll stumble across this:
Saturday's tests -- which featured the rare launch of two missiles -- are unlikely to aggravate tensions between the nuclear-armed neighbors, since they both routinely conduct missile tests.
And you might even conclude that short-range ballistic missiles aren't the problem:
Danger persists from "nuclear insiders with extremist sympathies, Al Qaeda or Taliban outsider attacks, and a weak state."
In other words: No, but thanks for asking.
So why is this the day's top story? I wonder if the comments section holds any clues:
WITH THE NUCLEAR COUNTRIES ADDING BETTER NUKES TO THEIR ARSENAL AND IRAN PRODUCING A NUKE THE CORRUPT AND DEVIOUS OBAMA IS ACCOMPLISHING HIS PURPOSE OF CREATING CHAOS AND TERROR THROUGHOUT THE WORLD
No Islamic state and no state run by a dictator should be allowed to possess weapons of mass destruction. We should immediately launch a strategic nuclear strike on Pakistan, Iran and North Korea. If we do not, then in the next several decades, they will trigger a global war of unimaginable proportions.
Isn't this the country that was shown dancing in the streets after 9/11? They should be well into there half life by now. Instead their Kenyan brother resides in DC, or as I like to call it, east california or mecca, the sequel.
And now back to your regularly scheduled programming.
Now. Should you read the story itself (and if you want to conclude from this that "reading the story" isn't a requirement at certain news outlets, go right ahead), you'll stumble across this:
Saturday's tests -- which featured the rare launch of two missiles -- are unlikely to aggravate tensions between the nuclear-armed neighbors, since they both routinely conduct missile tests.
And you might even conclude that short-range ballistic missiles aren't the problem:
Danger persists from "nuclear insiders with extremist sympathies, Al Qaeda or Taliban outsider attacks, and a weak state."
In other words: No, but thanks for asking.
So why is this the day's top story? I wonder if the comments section holds any clues:
WITH THE NUCLEAR COUNTRIES ADDING BETTER NUKES TO THEIR ARSENAL AND IRAN PRODUCING A NUKE THE CORRUPT AND DEVIOUS OBAMA IS ACCOMPLISHING HIS PURPOSE OF CREATING CHAOS AND TERROR THROUGHOUT THE WORLD
No Islamic state and no state run by a dictator should be allowed to possess weapons of mass destruction. We should immediately launch a strategic nuclear strike on Pakistan, Iran and North Korea. If we do not, then in the next several decades, they will trigger a global war of unimaginable proportions.
Isn't this the country that was shown dancing in the streets after 9/11? They should be well into there half life by now. Instead their Kenyan brother resides in DC, or as I like to call it, east california or mecca, the sequel.
And now back to your regularly scheduled programming.
Labels: fox, securitization
1 Comments:
Let's not forget China. 21 million Muslims, dictatorship (though it's not always clear who the dictator is), nuclear weapons.
Post a Comment
<< Home