Friday, March 19, 2010
Previous Posts
- Lying and ... what's that other one called again?
- Break out the clue bat
- Actually, no. Not at all.
- Today in journalism history
- Um, not quite
- And speaking of disaster myths ...
- One Of America's Newspapers
- Breaking news
- Hope not
- Get it?
Mailbag!
- vulteef [at] gmail [dot] com
- Testy Copy Editors
- ACES
- Bad Science
- Regret the Error
- Romenesko
- Common Sense Journalism
- You Don't Say
- EditTeach
- Ask the stylebook
- Media Watch
- Blogslot
- Editor's Desk
- Words at Work
- Ten Minutes Past Deadline
- Madam Grammar
- Media Myths Alert
- Old Word Wolf
- WSJ: Style and substance
- Today's Front Pages
- Language Hat
- Language Log
- The Greenbelt
- Language Politics
- Oxford University Press
- Mr. Verb and the other Verbs
- Wishydig
- Throw Grammar from the Train
- Sentence First
- Online syntax textbook (Santorini & Kroch)
- Economist country briefings
- State Dept. country data
- Inflation calculator
- VassarStats
2 Comments:
This goes without saying, but sports fans want to read about tactical ways one team can beat another. I suppose you could have something like "inside the x's and o's” or "strategy session” but I have no trouble with this as a subhead.
Nah, they'd be expecting that.
Post a Comment
<< Home