I'm sure you do
And while we're on the subject? Stop it with "London calling."
Labels: forbidden heds
posted by fev at 5:44 PM
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
And while we're on the subject? Stop it with "London calling."
Previous Posts
- If you already know ...
- The rockin' ammonia and the boogie-woogie flu
- 'Get off my lawn' in Mandarin
- Every fall, the trees are filled with underwear
- Random images: Your thoughts?
- Today in hed originality
- Bill Buckley, phone home
- Your friend the preposition
- Pain in the as
- No, but thanks for asking
Mailbag!
- vulteef [at] gmail [dot] com
- Testy Copy Editors
- ACES
- Bad Science
- Regret the Error
- Romenesko
- Common Sense Journalism
- You Don't Say
- EditTeach
- Ask the stylebook
- Media Watch
- Blogslot
- Editor's Desk
- Words at Work
- Ten Minutes Past Deadline
- Madam Grammar
- Media Myths Alert
- Old Word Wolf
- WSJ: Style and substance
- Today's Front Pages
- Language Hat
- Language Log
- The Greenbelt
- Language Politics
- Oxford University Press
- Mr. Verb and the other Verbs
- Wishydig
- Throw Grammar from the Train
- Sentence First
- Online syntax textbook (Santorini & Kroch)
- Economist country briefings
- State Dept. country data
- Inflation calculator
- VassarStats
1 Comments:
It's not just pointless, it's typically untrue -- neither the journalist nor the sub probably says 'to-mah-to' (but the reader might)
Post a Comment
<< Home