Thursday, March 27, 2008
Previous Posts
- A cook, a comma, a panda ...
- Content that isn't there
- Out-of-tune hed of the month
- AP: Sun rises in East
- No, not really
- Whom's next?
- Be scared! No, scareder!
- Journalism weirdness of the day
- Numbers held hostage
- The potions and the motions
Mailbag!
- vulteef [at] gmail [dot] com
- Testy Copy Editors
- ACES
- Bad Science
- Regret the Error
- Romenesko
- Common Sense Journalism
- You Don't Say
- EditTeach
- Ask the stylebook
- Media Watch
- Blogslot
- Editor's Desk
- Words at Work
- Ten Minutes Past Deadline
- Madam Grammar
- Media Myths Alert
- Old Word Wolf
- WSJ: Style and substance
- Today's Front Pages
- Language Hat
- Language Log
- The Greenbelt
- Language Politics
- Oxford University Press
- Mr. Verb and the other Verbs
- Wishydig
- Throw Grammar from the Train
- Sentence First
- Online syntax textbook (Santorini & Kroch)
- Economist country briefings
- State Dept. country data
- Inflation calculator
- VassarStats
2 Comments:
Not "too long" perhaps, but long enough. I hope "blight" is used frequently over there - I'm fairly sure that I've never seen "blight launch" before! Wow.
My blight launched on time, thank you very much.
Yes, 'blight' is common-ish headlinese over here. Not a word much used in conversation, I feel.
I also feel it should be a strong verb: yesterday I blit. Sadly it is not so.
Post a Comment
<< Home